THE PLUNDERERS
by Michael Coughlin
Mike writes about a very delicate subject, at least in the minds of some people but such thoughts need to be considered by people who think the government owes them everything. Philosophies are as diversified as there are classes or kinds of people. The so-called working class of people think differently than those who own or run the corporations that provide jobs for the workers. Some may call such a thought a "No Brainer" but then some may not see the differences at all. Mike and I are close compatriots regarding the generation we represent. The generation in which we were raised obviously regarded the role of government much different than many today. The politicians elected to office, it could be said, are trying to give their constituents what they want rather than what they need. Wants and needs are not the same. Mike is a full-time commercial printer in his one-man shop in Cornucopia, Wisconsin. Visit his website and you may get a better understanding of the way Mike regards life. THE WORDWRIGHT - http://www.superiorletterpress.com/ourshop.html
The other day there was a news broadcast in which a couple women wondered aloud why politicians were doing nothing to help solve the "crisis" in medical care facing people in the United States, particularly older Americans. One was practically crying when she talked about the choice her grandmother had to make between paying to heat her home or buying her prescription drugs. Washington needed to help her grandmother. It wasn't right that Americans had to make such choices and it was long past the time government should have done something to help, she argued.
I'm sure the two women walked away from the microphone feeling proud of their efforts to help solve the medical care problem. They had demonstrated their concern. They were involved. They were advocates for the less fortunate in our country. They could feel proud of themselves because they care and are compassionate. And I'm convinced that many others looked at them and thought about how noble the two women were, especially the one who was so troubled by the plight of her grandmother.
But as I listened, I came away with quite another picture of the two. I didn't see compassion. I saw arrogance. I saw two women who said that they have the right to force other people to work for them.
These women, and so many others like them, hide behind government to steal from others. They act as though their good intentions excuse their thievery. They are part of a group of people I refer to as "plunderers." Their noble causes serve to mask the ugly nature of their actions. But noble motives cannot justify their behavior. Noble motives don't change the nature of plunder.
Every man and woman has sole claim to his or her life and every person has sole claim to his or her labor and the fruits of their labor. If people choose to give their lives and labor to help others, that is a choice they make and a choice they have every right to make. No one, however, has a right to take anything from another. No one has a claim on the life or property of anyone else. To believer otherwise is to sanction theft and slavery, that is, plunder.
Slavery isn't a race issue. It isn't a class issue. It is the forcible taking of the lives and property of others. It doesn't matter who does the taking or what excuse he offers.
These women wanted the government to bare its teeth on their behalf. They wanted the tax collector with his billy club to extort money from others to hand over to the grandmother. By hiding behind the mask of government, they can appear civilized and generous while their hired politicians are taking money (taxes) from their neighbors. If they went directly to their neighbors and demanded money for the grandmother's prescriptions, everyone would recognize that a theft had occurred. But when they hide behind the mantle of politicians and tax collectors, they can pretend to be compassionate.
I wish I had been able to ask them some questions. For example:
"You look like healthy strong young women. How much money are you earning to make sure your grandmother(s) have the care and medicine they need? Why don't you and your family look after your own grandmother? Why do you want to make someone else do it for you?
Why should someone else have to pay for your grandmother's prescriptions? What right do you have to take money away from others so your grandmother won't have to use her savings (your inheritance?) to pay for her medicine?
Do you or your grandmother have the right to make someone else work to support you? If you do, how and when was it that the other person became your slave?
What makes you think that calling on Washington to do something won't make the problem worse? Washington has waged a multi-trillion dollar war on poverty since the 1960's and we are no closer to eliminating poverty now than we were then. Billions have been sunk into government housing programs and many of the worse crime-infested neighborhoods in our cities are in those government-sponsored housing projects. Why do you think that getting government increasingly involved in the medical industry won't drive the cost of medical care totally out of sight and eventually lead to government-mandated and directed rationing? Then where will your grandmother and the rest of us be? At the mercy of some bureaucrat!
Some medical costs are high. But could it be that those costs, in part, already reflect Washington's deep involvement in the medical care industry? What part of those costs are due to the out-of-control court costs in government-run courts? Won't getting the government even more involved raise medical costs more dramatically, just as the cost of higher education went through the roof after Washington started footing education expenses?
You pretend to be compassionate, caring people. But your selfish, greedy natures, your disdain for your neighbor and desire for his money are all to evident to be a careful observer. If you really do love your grandmother, then set aside part of your life and your money to take care of her. Don't demand that others shoulder your family responsibilities. She is your grandmother!"
These women are not untypical of a certain segment of America. They think they have a claim to other people's lives and labor. They imagine some "need" and then demand government force people to pay for it. The size of the eyes and the perception of what they can get away with are all that set limits on their demands. A century ago nobody would have pretended that medical care was a "right" enforceable against the earnings of other people. No one would have suggested his neighbor should be forced to buy medicine for him. But America has grown fat and rich during the intervening century, and the greedy have crawled out of the woodwork to demand they get a portion of other people's pie. They don't wear the pirate's patch and wield his sword, but they are about the same business he was -- living off the life and labor of others. They mask their behavior behind some high-sounding rhetoric. They pretend to be compassionate, but the truth is they show no compassion for those who are forced to pay for their pet projects. It is clear that our country's great wealth is devouring any moral sense we may have had. We have taken up the religion of ease and convenience and have cast aside personal responsibility.
Recently while I was thinking about this, I remembered a couple quotes from distinguished Americans, quotes that I think fit most appropriately with this subject. Both come from men intimately involved with the struggle to eliminate black slavery in this country, Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass--who himself spent his youth as a slave. They understood slavery. Their words capture its ugly nature.
To you two women, I dedicate these words of Lincoln and Douglass:
The Eternal Struggle
"It is the eternal struggle between two principles, right and wrong, throughout the world. It's the same spirit that says you toil and work and earn bread and I'll eat it. No matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a king who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men as an apology for enslaving another race, it is the same tyrannical principle."
Abraham Lincoln
"...rightfully my own" "I was now getting, as I have said, one dollar and fifty cents per day. I contracted for it; I earned it; it was paid to me; it was rightfully my own; yet upon each returning Saturday night, I was compelled to deliver every cent of that money to Master Hugh. And why? Not because he earned it,--not because he had any hand in earning it,--not because I owed it to him,--not because he possessed the slightest shadow of a right to it; but solely because he had the power to compel me to give it up. The right of the grim-visaged pirate upon the high sea is exactly the same." Frederick Douglass
From the heart of Mike Coughlin…" . . . I hope it [the essay] causes some people to think about what really happens when politicians dig into our pocketbooks. It isn't just our money they are running off with. It is a piece of our life, a part of our dreams, something we won't be able to pass along to our children or give to someone we feel could use it. No, the politician in his (her) wisdom has seen fit to take it for his pet project. And we who have created it--given up part of our days and nights to earn it--see it grabbed away from us. It's no different than when the burglar broke into our house and walked off with a pile of our things. Well, in truth there is a difference. The burglar at least doesn't pretend he has a claim on our possessions. He doesn't go about making a public spectacle of his generosity and big heart like the politician does."
Want to read more of Mike’s writings? Type "Michael Coughlin" in the Search Window.